Endorsing An Ecological Restoration Mission to Restore Social, Racial, and Environmental Justice.

Basic Assumptions That Underlie Ecological Restoration

Like all undertakings in life, ecological restoration is based upon a number of  explicit and implicit assumptions.  This is not a complete list.  Not all restoration ecologists subscribe to all of these assumptions, nor, surprisingly, not everyone shares in this world view.

1.  One assumption that drives restoration is that many parts of Earth are damaged, destroyed, or missing.  As a result, the Earth’s natural capital (the total accumulation of the goods and services provided by global ecosystems) is diminished, to the detriment of the well-being of the planet and its human and non-human inhabitants.

2.  Further, restorationists assume that solutions exist to repair the damage to ecosystems and their value to the world.  

3.  Thirdly, we also assume that some people  have some capacity to care for the planet and to repair the damaged parts of the Earth’s systems.

4.  People—except for neighborhood volunteers and local neighborhoods themselves—are not part of the restoration problem definition/solution.  Until recently ecological restoration confined itself to the repair of damaged plant an animal communities, with the occasional concession to local neighbors—frequently well-to-do white suburban neighborhoods.

5.  Restoration ecologists assume that our repair work can keep pace with environmental destruction all around us.  

6.  And, perhaps, the rest of the world will follow our example and quit messing up the environment, and pitch in to help out.

This is the basis upon which the global ecological restoration enterprise was founded and upon which it has thrives.

Restoration Contributions

Many desired restoration outcomes have been achieved across the globe in the past 85 years since the UW-Madison Arboretum and the restoration work in Australia began.   Restoration is a global efforts and the cumulative scale of the projects is impressive, but still tiny compared to the need; the achievement of restoration outcomes feels like swimming upstream to those doing the restoration.  It is exhilarating work but sometimes discouraging and it also creates a dilemma for restorationists—we work at the indulgence of those who cause the destruction; our work depends upon their continued wrecking of the earth.

Despite ecological restoration work around the globe, we are falling behind.  Our creative ecological work can’t keep up with the rate of destruction.  Why?

What’s Missing?

For one thing, restorationists, have sometimes been treating symptoms (drained wetlands, degraded prairies,) instead of the root causes of ecological damage which is human activities (mining, logging, commercial building, etc.)

Also missing is an explicit assumption that ecological restoration should benefit people—especially people of color, and civic communities—directly.

Ecological restoration should adopt a mission to repair our disintegrating cities;  to help our urban poor, assist the homeless, and the disenfranchised; ecological restoration should block the actions of predatory capitalist systems that pave over our farmland and natural areas before we an even think about restoring them.

As long as our fellow citizens and our communities suffer, are not free, and are not safe, then none of us will be healthy and none of us will be free and none of us safe, and the ecological damage will continue.

Things must change and restoration ecology is uniquely qualified to jump into the fray and help those already engaged in social and human services efforts.

We Need Some New, Additional Assumptions on Which Ecological Restoration Can Be Based.

Look around at the mess this country has  created and and you can see that ecological restoration’s  basic operating assumptions—while perhaps necessary at one time—are no longer sufficient in today’s world.  Before we can repair our nation’s damaged ecosystems, we must repair of our country’s social, racial,  cultural.  If you have any doubt about the need, look at the mass demonstrations across the country the past two weeks.  People in the streets are calling for social, racial, and environmental justice.

The SER Mission, Vision, and Guiding Principles

The Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) has a mission, vision, and guiding principles that address this issue head-on:  guidance.

“Across the globe, centuries of unsustainable activities have damaged the aquatic, marine, and terrestrial environments that underpin our economies and societies and give rise to a diversity of wildlife and plants. SER is dedicated to reversing this degradation and restoring the earth for the benefit of humans and nature.

Our Mission

SER advances the science, practice and policy of ecological restoration to sustain biodiversity, improve resilience in a changing climate, and re-establish an ecologically healthy relationship between nature and culture.

Our Vision

Ecological restoration becomes a fundamental component of conservation and sustainable development programs throughout the world by virtue of its inherent capacity to provide people with the opportunity to not only repair ecological damage, but also improve the human condition.

Our Guiding Principles

These underlying principles guide and inform our work:

  • Ecological restoration is an engaging and inclusive process. Restoration embraces the interrelationships between nature and culture, engages all sectors of society, and enables full and effective participation of indigenous, local and disenfranchised communities
  • Ecological restoration requires the integration of knowledge and practice. Science and other forms of knowledge are essential for designing, implementing and monitoring restoration projects and programs. At the same time, lessons learned from practical experiences are essential for determining and prioritizing the scientific needs of the field.
  • Ecological restoration is policy-relevant and essential. Restoration is a critical tool for achieving biodiversity conservation, mitigating and adapting to climate change, enhancing ecosystem services, fostering sustainable socioeconomic development, and improving human health and well-being.
  • Ecological restoration is practiced locally with global implications. Restoration takes place in all regions of the world, with local actions having regional and global benefits for nature and people.

“A Restoration Ethic”

Hull and Robertson (2000, “Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities.”)  suggest that by restoring damage to the Earth’s systems, we also enter into a relationship with the planet that helps repairs our connection to nature and our own communities, thereby increasing our own social  and personal capital.

This set of assumptions constitute what Hull and Robertson might call “ a restoration ethic”.   In their view, restoration blurs the distinction between culture and nature and opens up a broad  middle ground where it is acceptable for humans and nature to interact.

I would suggest we broaden the restoration ethic to include repairing our relationships with our fellow humans.

Examples of Direct Action

The SER guiding principles are excellent.  But I am suggesting that those in the discipline–both paid professionals and community volunteers–build upon them by taking direct action, on our own, in addition to our traditional ecological restoration work, to aid our communities, by, for example picking one of these suggestions for individual and community civic action.  Many of you, I know, are already doing one, or more, of these civic engagement strategies to great effect

Lend your expertise to start or working with a community garden in your area.

Teach people how to grow their own food.

Organize and lead efforts to restore and improve habitat in your neighborhood.

Work with a food bank or other community action non-profit.

Help with literacy programs in your area.

Find ways to fight poverty.

Help register people to vote in November 2020.

Join the governing board of a local non-profit.

Run for local political office.

Organize neighborhood clean-up efforts.

Join a local science-advisory board.

Offer your scientific or practical plant expertise to a local neighborhood-based restoration project.

Publish a news blog covering local news and events that are not covered by the local paper.  If there is no local paper, such an effort is even more important.

Help clean up a vacant lot and grow native plants in it.

Teach kids and neighbors how to identify plants and birds.

Help design and install residential rain gardens and/or pollinator gardens.

Human activities are the cause of environmental destruction.  Human activities are also the cause of the destruction of our cities, and their citizens. Only human activities c Gan reverse the damage we have done.

 We are where we are today as the direct result of the sum total of human activities throughout our existence and thus we are all complicit and we are all responsible for repairing the damage (Ghosh, 2016).   The vast disruption to, and outright destruction of, ecosystems, and the poisoning of the air, land, and water have presented restoration ecologists with vast challenges and opportunities and responsibilities.  Opportunities exist to attempt to reverse some of this damage; to save some small portion of the at-risk plants and animals, and to restore or recreate other small patches of prairie, savanna, coral reefs, and tropical forests.  But restoration of ecosystems is only half of the job; we have a responsibility to help repair our society..  Repair of our social and cultural systems is mandatory.   Without this effort, attempts at ecological restoration are irrelevant, meaningless, and futile.


Ghosh, Amitav. 2016.  The Great Derangement, climate change and the unthinkable.  Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Hull and Robertson (2000, “Conclusion: Which Nature” IN Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by P.H.Gobster and R.B. Hull, 299-307, Washington. DC Island Press

Posted in Basic assumptions of restoration ecology, Community-based restoration, Ecological restoration, Neighborhood restoration projects, Restoration ecology, Social Justice, Society for Ecological Restoration | 5 Comments

The River Avon System as a Model for Land and Water Management

The River Avon and Madison Wisconsin’s Waterways: A contrast in environmental management

The River Avon In Salisbury, England on the city edge.

During a recent trip to SW England, I had the pleasure in the city of Dorchester, of walking along the clear, free-flowing River Avon and enjoying its ancient water meadows—wetlands managed for the common good and as a source of forage and pasture and public recreation—not far from the town’s center. 

In Dorchester and Salisbury I was impressed by this river’s sediment-free water, its healthy fish and waterfowl populations, abundant stream-bank vegetation, absence of bank erosion, and lack of blue-green algae. 

The water meadows I saw are centuries old and play a key role in maintaining the high water quality of the River Avon system.  In fact, it is for good reason that the River Avon and its tributaries are internationally recognized for their ecological, social, and cultural importance and in England are designated a Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

Contrast that idyllic situation with the reality in Madison and Dane County, Wisconsin where we often can’t use and enjoy our waterways to their fullest in the summer because they are clogged with toxic blue-green algae and other water weeds.

Clearly, the English understand something about managing the landscape to maintain and improve water quality—they have been doing this since the ancients who built Stonehenge floated bluestones down the sacred River Avon to their final destination on the Salisbury Plain.

The River Avon flows for at least 10 miles from Stonehenge to Salisbury through an agricultural landscape as extensively cultivated as any in Dane County, Wisconsin.

We need to take this opportunity to learn from the English land and water managers and employ their strategies and tactics here.  There are many fine land and water management agencies in Madison and Dane County (Clean Lakes Alliance, Friends of Lake Wingra, and the Dane County Land and Waters Resources Department, among them) doing good work. 

But, these organizations can’t do it alone and need the help of all of us—working for the common good—to make more of our waters increasingly fishable, swimmable, and drinkable.  


Protecting the River Avon https://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/media/993/Protecting-the-River-Avon-SAC/pdf/Protecting-river-avon-sac-biodiversity.pdf?m=637183939031430000#:~:text=The%20River%20Avon%20is%20a,Conservation%20(SAC)%20in%202000

The Salisbury Water Meadows https://www.salisburywatermeadows.org.uk

Posted in Watershed protection | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Glenway Golf Course Grounds Closed to the Public Until Grand Re-opening in Late 2022

Concern is over potential damage to new plantings made in 2021 from winter sports activities

City of Madison Parks Department asks citizens to refrain from walking on and damaging the new greens and thousands of plants installed in fall 2021.

Golf Course Redesigned in 2021

As area and watershed residents may know, City of Madison Parks spent much of 2021 redesigning the layout of the popular course; installing thousands of native plants; and putting in new turf. Survival of the plants and the success of the project is now threatened by damage through trampling and compaction caused by extensive foot traffic. The Glenway Golf Course (now called Glenway Park) was closed to the public during the construction phase and has yet to re-open. The new layout is expected to be unveiled in late 2022.

An open letter to neighborhood residents was recently sent to the Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association (DMNA) asking for restrain and cooperation from area residents. The letter is printed in full below:

“Glenway Golf Course Grounds CLOSED to the Public

An Important Message from the Parks Department:

Glenway Guests and the Community,

We need your help. As we move into winter and enjoy the fun of snow-related activities, we look for your assistance in helping share our important message with the public. The progress at the improved Glenway Golf Park is on schedule and shaping up for a great community asset to open later in 2022. However, activity in these areas will be extremely problematic to the success of the property and the native plantings. The extensive work includes more than 28,000 prairie plug plantings, prairie plant dormant seeding, new greens complexes, and extensive new turf, which is in a critical infant state. Today and throughout the winter and upcoming spring, the grounds are in a fragile and delicate state. Newly planted turf grasses and prairie planting remain susceptible to damage from winter weather, and more importantly the potential for damage caused by foot traffic and other recreation.

Since our first snowfalls of the seasons, we have noticed extensive concerns on the property that will hinder our opening in 2022. Sledding and building of snow creations on the greens will cause substantial kill to the infant grass that lay under the snow. Compression of snow onto these sites will ultimately kill the weak grasses and will need extra work and money to ensure they are usable in the spring. With that, we ask with utmost importance that the public remains off the fenced areas. Many fences were taken down by the large wind storm we had a few weeks ago, however most fencing remains intact.

Due to the sensitive grounds throughout the entire property, and to ensure an on-time 2022 opening, the Glenway Park grounds are CLOSED to the public. This includes walking, cross-country skiing, sledding, and snowshoeing. We understand this is a popular destination for many during the winter months and hope you will assist us in sharing this message with your community. While this temporary closure may be upsetting to some, the intention of the property for winters in the future is bright.  We look forward to promoting new and improved winter use in the future at Glenway Golf Park. However this winter we must ask people to remain off and find alternate locations to enjoy winter outdoors.

We thank you all for your support and interest in the new site and look forward to seeing everyone back enjoying outdoor recreation in 2022.”


Theran Steindl
Glenway Project Manager
Golf Operations Supervisor

To learn more about the Glenway Golf Course redesign project click this link

Posted in City of Madison Parks, Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association, Glenway Golf Course, Glenway Prairie | Leave a comment

Social and Cultural History of Lake Wingra Watershed

Charlie Nelson and The Henderson Murders

The Lost Henderson Farm

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is img_4926.jpeg
An interpretive sign in the UW-Madison Arboretum explaining the story of the Henderson Farm and the murders of Walter and Allen Henderson. Sign is at the T5 Trail intersection in the NE corner of the Grady Tract.

Among Madison’s prominent citizens were many African American families who began moving from the southern U.S.  to Dane County and Madison as early as the 1850’s (Simms 2018).  Newly-arrived African Americans were small-business people, cooks, cleaners, barbers, and farmers.

Notley Henderson was part of the northward migration after the Civil War. Henderson moved from Kentucky in the late 1860’s (Simms, 2018). Henderson worked as a farm hand and in the late 1880’s had earned enough money to marry Martha and buy a farmstead. Henderson’s land was located on the northern portion of what is now the current Grady Tract of the UW-Madison Arboretum but was at the time on the southern outskirts of the Arboretum. The Arboretum has installed an interpretive sign near the site of the Henderson farm.

Unfortunately, Notley Henderson’s son Allen and Allen’s son Walter were both shot and killed on March 5, 1927 by one Charles Nelson (according to both Simms (2018) and Arboretum research and interpretive materials.).  Walter’s body was found in a section of woods along Nakoma Road;  Allen Henderson was next and was shot at his farm. 

Charles Nelson, “a former mental patient and son of a local real estate developer, shot himself when approached by officials.” (Simms, 2018)  

The Henderson’s, unable to support themselves, lost their farm soon after the murders and moved into downtown Madison (Simms, 2018).

The Mystery of the Henderson Murders

The double-murder of the Hendersons is related to the springs only in so far as the body of Walter Henderson was tossed into the woods along Nakoma Road, at an unknown spot that was probably not too far from the Duck Pond Springs.

There are several unanswered questions about the Henderson murders.  One,  where exactly, was the Henderson body dumped?  Two, why was the body hauled three to four miles up Seminole Highway and Nakoma Road to dump it in a wooded area along Nakoma Road?   

I don’t know the answer to the second question but one possible answer to the first is somewhere near the springs and most likely the Duck Pond Springs.

This is just speculation but is a reasonable guess because Nakoma Road is not a long street; there are not many wooded lots along it; and an easily-accessibly spot with a wooded area, would have been the Duck Pond Springs—close to the road and all that.


Noland, W.E. 1950. The Hydrography, Fish, and Turtle Population of Lake Wingra. Wisconsin Academy of Arts, Sciences and Letters, Madison, WI.

Oakes, E.L., G.E. Hendrickson, and E.E.Zuehls, Hudrology of the Lake Wingra Basin, Dane County, WI., U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, WI.

Pennequin, D.F. and M.P. Anderson. 1981. The Groundwater Budget of Lake Wingra, Dane County, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Water Resources Center. Madison, WI

Sachse, Nancy.  1965.  A Thousand Ages.  Board of Regents of The University of Wisconsin.

Simms. Muriel.  2018.  Settlin’, Stories of Madison’s Early African American Families.  Wisconsin Historical Press.  Madison, WI

Posted in Restoration ecology | Leave a comment

Lake Wingra West Watershed Study Final Draft Report Released

The City of Madison Engineering Division has just released its final draft study of flooding issues in the West end of the Lake Wingra Watershed. The Wingra West full final draft report is now available for viewing. Public review is welcomed and comments should be sent to pgaebler@cityofmadison.com


The West Wingra Watershed study is a rich and detailed source of information about how much water enters the watershed and, when, and where it flows. The study examined nearly every pipe, culvert, street, storm drain, and holding pond in the study area. The report documents that frequently the amount and duration of rainfall overwhelms the pipes, streets, and culverts designed to manage it.

The report is detailed but not overly technical. Although it does have some highly technical parts these are more intended for stormwater engineers and project designers rather than for the casual reader and skipping these sections will not detract from an understanding of the overall report. The report makes a great reference work and serves as a blueprint for handling current and expected stormwater impacts in the Lake Wingra Watershed

Project Background and Purpose

Because Madison has experienced an increased frequency and intensity of flooding events in recent years–the most significant of these events occurred in August of 2018 when 10.5 inches of rain fell on Madison’s west side in a 12 hour period; an unprecedented event–the study was undertaken to gain an understanding of the scope and scale of flooding issues and thus to design ways to address flooding issues.

Flooded intersection in the Nakoma Neighborhood of Madison after historic rain of August 2018.

The overall purpose of the study is to develop a comprehensive stormwater management plan (SWMP) for the Wingra West watershed that will guide the City in meeting its flood mitigation goals.

Study Setting

The Wingra West watershed is located on the west side of the city of Madison (see Figure 1-1in the report) and covers approximately 1,763 acres. The extent of the watershed is shown on Figure 1-2 in the report. The watershed drainage is generally west to east and outlets into the UW Arboretum at two locations:

  1. The outlet from Manitou Pond, located at the corner of Manitou Way and Nakoma Road
  2. A 3-foot by 6-foot box storm sewer that discharges into the UW Arboretum east of Manitou Way,approximately 700 feet south of the intersection with Nakoma Road.

Prominent geographic features in the watershed include:

  1. Odana Pond located within the Odana Hills Golf Course. This water feature is discussed in more detail in Section 2.3.1
  2. The Beltline Highway (USH 12/USH 14) passes through the watershed from northwest to southeast. There are several major culverts crossing the highway (conveying water from south to north), and the highway itself has a drainage system that is owned and operated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT).
  3. The Southwest Bike Path splits the watershed into an upstream and downstream area. All runoff from the area upstream (west and north) of the path crosses the path at a single culvert located near Waite Circle.

Description of the Study Results

This document generally consists of two parts. The first part, including Sections 2 through 6, describes the first of phase of the project, which was comprised of

  1. The development of input parameters for the watershed’s hydrologic/hydraulic model
  2. Actual construction of the stormwater hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) model
  3. The calibration process for that model
  4. The modeling results showing flooding under the watershed’s existing physical conditions.

The second phase of the project involved:

  1. The analyses of alternative flood mitigation measures
  2. The flood reductions that can be expected from those mitigation measures
  3. Specific recommendations for flood reduction actions

Sections 9 through 14 of this report documents the second phase of the project.

Figure 1-1 shows the location of the study area within the City. Figure 1-2 provides a more detailed view of the watershed

In the Meantime

We will delve into this report in greater detail in future posts as we absorb its contents and come to grips with the practical and budgetary implications of its recommendations. At the least, studying this draft report will prove invaluable in understanding the causes and consequences of flooding issues that arise during the next large rain event in our Lake Wingra Watershed.

Posted in City of Madison Engineering Division, Lake Wingra Watershed, Storm water, Stormwater best management practices | Leave a comment

Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association Winter Solstice Bonfire Dec. 21, 2021

The annual Bagpipes and Bonfires restoration celebration sponsored by the Lake Forest (Illinois) Open Lands Association. near Middlefork Savanna

From the Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association comes this reminder of their annual Winter Solstice Bonfire on Tuesday December 21, 2021. The bonfire won’t be as roaring and large as the one pictured above from an event in Chicago a few years ago, but it will definitely be fun and welcoming.

“Join us for an annual Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association (DMNA) tradition: the family-friendly Winter Solstice Bonfire at Glenwood Children’s Park!

The bonfire takes place on the winter solstice: Tuesday, December 21st from 4-7pm.

Enjoy S’MORES & songs with HOT CHOCOLATE from Madison Chocolate Co, and a bonfire at sunset!

Follow the luminaria to the council ring. Bring your own mugs to save paper.”

Posted in Dudgeon-Monroe Neighborhood Association, Winter Solstice | Leave a comment

Blue-Green Algae in Lake Wingra and other Madison Lakes

Water quality at Madison’s popular beaches (21 of them) is monitored regularly for E. coli bacteria and blue-green algae contamination from Memorial Day through Labor Day, by Public Health Madison and Dane County. If a water test shows concerning results, the beach will close for swimming until levels of E. coli bacteria or blue-green algae decline. Today, 07.22.21 beaches at Olin, Spring Harbor, and Vilas Park are closed for swimming.

Test results change frequently due to weather conditions, wind patterns, heat, etc. so before you go to a beach or enter the water check the conditions at this Beach Water Quality web site. Public Health Madison and Dane County has an informative behind-the-scenes look at A Day In the Life: Beach Testing that explains the hows, whys, and wherefores of water quality testing.

Toxicity and Harmful Affects of Blue-green algae

There are many species of blue-green algae in Wisconsin waters, and not all are toxic. Therefore it is difficult to determine just by looking at the lake’s surface if the algae you see is harmful or not. This is why Public Health Madison and Dane County conducts regular testing to make an official determination. Even after water quality sampling, it takes several days for the lab to analyze the samples and determine if toxins are present.

Toxic forms of blue-green algae are neurotoxic and cause harm to the central nervous system. For a rundown of the various symptoms of exposure to toxic blue-green algae, see this page.

Safety Precautions for Dealing With Blue-green Algae

Public Health Madison and Dane County offers this advice:

Despite its name, blue-green algae may not always be blue-green. It may also be reddish-purple or brown. Blue-green algae causes the water to be murky.

“When environmental conditions are just right, blue-green algae can grow very quickly. Most species are buoyant and will float to the surface, where they form scum layers or floating mats.”

“Do not swim in water that looks like “pea soup”, green or blue paint, or that has a scum layer or puffy blobs floating on the surface.
Do not boat, kayak, or water ski in water with blue-green algae (you can be exposed to the toxins through breathing).
Do not let children play with scum layers, even from shore.
Do not let pets or livestock swim in or drink water with blue-green algae blooms.
Do not treat water that has blue-green algae blooms with any herbicide or algaecide – toxins are released into the water when blue-green algae cells die.”

I was surprised to see the vast extent and distribution of blue-green algae in Lake Wingra when I took a little tour of the lake shore the other day–the stuff is everywhere. But, is it all toxic? We don’t know. Water quality is tested only at Madison’s beaches and the former beach at Hudson Park on Madison’s East side. Other public access points such as the the boat launch and other spots in Wingra Park are not tested, as far as is known. Or, if they are, the results are not made public.

Our only clue to beach water quality in Lake Wingra comes from the posted test results for Vilas Beach, on the eastern end of the lake, which is closed today, July 22 and will remain closed until conditions improve. Water quality of Madison’s beaches is posted daily at the Public Health Madison and Dane County web site. Click here to get a status report on water quality at Madison’s official beaches.

Some Lake Wingra Springs Also Have Blue-green algae

I was surprised to find the Spring Trail Pond about 75% covered in a blue-green algae mat the other day. Surprised because Spring Trail Pond is spring fed and receives little storm water runoff and urban contamination. It does have a year-round mallard flock. See image below:

Blue-green algae covering Spring Trail Pond. Even the mallards are reluctant to enter the water.

Is this algae toxic? No way to tell except through a lab analysis. Is E. coli bacteria present in harmful concentrations? Again, only a test can determine its presence. But, given the year-round abundance of mallards and other ducks at the pond, it is a good bet that the waters are unhealthy. The only safe approach is to avoid entering the water when you see a water body that looks like this.

Wisconsin DNR

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources offers much information about where to report an algae bloom, general symptoms from contact with blue-green algae, and general questions about blue-green algae. Click here for the DNR blue-green algae website.

Posted in Duck Pond Springs, Lake Wingra, Lake Wingra Watershed, Madison lakes and beaches, Water quality in Madison | Leave a comment

Lake Wingra Recreational Bike Loop Update

One of the most popular running, biking, and walking routes in Madison is the 10K (6.2 miles) recreational loop around Lake Wingra and through the University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum.

This routes passes through several Madison neighborhoods: Nakoma, Dudgeon-Monroe, and Vilas, through the University Arboretum and the City and Towns of Madison, two city parks, and some of the most beautiful scenery in town.

Some of the route is free of car/truck traffic. But bikers, runners, and walkers contend with traffic along the 3 mile stretch through the Arb, a small section through Vilas Park and close by the Dane County Zoo, for two blocks between Arbor Drive and Wingra Park and another troublesome section of several blocks between the North end of Wingra Park and Woodrow Street.

Tolerating low-volume car traffic is a small price to pay for the luxury and privilege of living in a relatively crime-free and up-scale residential section of town. And, a small irritant in an otherwise peaceful and bucolic landscape. The advocates for a car-free route come mostly from the Edgewood College community and the Vilas Neighborhood.

Soon, parts of the Lake Wingra recreational loop will that currently allow cars will become car-free through the City’s “Shared Streets Plan” and the “Vilas Park Car-Free Interim Plan”

The Board of Park Commissioners passed the Vilas Park Drive car-free interim plan on May 12. An implementation timeline does not exist yet. If you want to dive into more details about the interim plan, you can view it here.  According to District 13 Alder Evers’ blog post,

Shared Streets

From the May, 2021 Friends of Lake Wingra Newsletter: “On May 12 the Transportation Commission met. One agenda item reviewed the Shared Streets program and included an open discussion for recommendations. During 2020’s Shared Streets program, the City focused on providing additional space for people to safely social distance when walking or biking while getting outside. Now, in 2021 the City will shift the program’s focus. It proposes to trial shared street options that can lead to permanent solutions prioritizing bicycle and pedestrian safety.”

“Friends of Lake Wingra urged the Transportation Commission to consider adding a repurposed bike lane along Monroe Street, between Woodrow and Wingra Park, onto the 2021 Shared Streets program through written comments.  A repurposed bike lane along this section of Monroe Street appeared on the proposed 2021’s Shared Streets list in the Department of Transportation’s annual report. However, it was not included in the final proposal presented to the Transportation Commission. At the beginning of the meeting, Alder Evers of District 13 acknowledged that this area acts as a weak link in the Lake Wingra pedestrian and bicycle recreational loop. He also stated it would need attention in the future.  Additionally, a few transportation members asked about this during the discussion. Yang Tao, head of City of Madison’s Traffic and Engineering, said City Traffic is looking to make this portion of the Lake Wingra bicycle and pedestrian route closer to Lake Wingra.  This envisioned bicycle and pedestrian path would connect Vilas Park Drive and Pleasure Drive directly to the Wingra Park. Tao did not provide a timeline for this potential alternative. “

Posted in City of Madison Parks, Lake Wingra, Lake Wingra Watershed | Leave a comment