Authors say “Novel Ecosystems are a Trojan Horse for Conservation”


Because “they provide a license to trash nature if they provide ecosystem services”,  according to a recent article in Ensia, by Daniel Simberloff, Carolina Murcia, and James Aronson.  Ensia is an online  “magazine showcasing environmental solutions in action”, and published by the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota.

In the article,  the authors push back against the idea of novel ecosystems, which is steamrolling over restoration ecologists, and threatens to reduce the credibility of ecological restoration.  The vaguely defined idea of novel ecosystems and the accusation, by its proponents of the futility of restoration, the authors suggest, provides a convenient excuse to anyone wanting to damage the environment if they create a “novel ecosystem” to replace a prairie, a wetland,  or pine forest, for example,

 

Advertisements

About Steve Glass

The blogger is a restoration ecologist practicing and writing in the Midwestern United States.
This entry was posted in Ecological restoration, Novel Ecosystems, Restoration ecology and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s