Visionary Plans for Monroe Street and Lake Wingra Watershed


Recently we’ve been covering green infrastructure programs locally and nationally.    For example earlier posts described the Wisconsin Environmental Initiative’s “Clean Clear Waters Challenge”; and at the national level the Natural Resource Defense Council’s “Rooftops to Rivers” Emerald City program.

So this week people let us dig deeper into the local Green Infrastructure scene and see what’s possible and planned for right here in Madison’s Lake Wingra Watershed.  (See watershed map here.)    For one thing, students in the Landscape Architecture Department of UW-Madison have produced a set of visionary plans for the Lake Wingra Watershed in general, and for Monroe Street and the Dudgeon-Monroe neighborhood, in particular.

Green Infrastructure

We’ll take a look at these in a bit, but first a refresher.  Green infrastructure as you recall is a planning framework and set of strategies for managing storm water in ways that increase absorption of rainfall into the soil and groundwater, reduce runoff and erosion, all the while enhancing the ecological, social, and cultural values that make a neighborhood and city livable.

Green infrastructure is the newer, and creative alternative to traditional “grey infrastructure” and incorporates bioswales, rain gardens, rain barrels, porous or permeable pavement, and plantings of native trees and shrubs that encourage the capture and infiltration of rainfall.   (A bioswale is basically a long, narrow rain garden used to slow down and capture storm water runoff.)

Green infrastructure is preventative.  It relies on an upstream end approach.  Green infrastructure encourages and facilitates the infiltration of rain (and snow melt) close to where it falls–before it has a chance to run downhill and scour the landscape on its way to, oh, say, the Arboretum and Lake Wingra.

Grey Infrastructure

“Grey infrastructure” on the other hand is the traditional method of storm water management and relies upon such tools as storm water conveyance pipes, culverts, rip-rap, concrete channels, and detention ponds.   And lately,  the addition of aluminum sulphate to storm water to capture and settle out sediment and phosphorous and bury them on the bottom of storm water ponds.

This is also what soil destruction looks like.  Manitou Way resurfacing and new curbs and gutters installed fall of 2012 are already giving way above a storm drain.

A typical example of “Grey infrastructure” used for storm water management.  It’s so common that we see it everyday and don’t even notice it.

Grey infrastructure is an “end of the pipe” or reactionary strategy.  Grey infrastructure bypasses upstream opportunities to capture and infiltrate rainfall and postpones action until storm water reaches the downstream end of the pipe and dumps the storm water into a receiving body of water–be it a stream, detention pond, or lake.

Alternatives to Grey Infrastructure Stormwater Management Needed and Proven Feasible

Any integrated watershed stormwater management approach must rely on a mix of green and grey infrastructure–it is not likely that either one of these approaches, used in isolation from other approaches, will solve all of a watershed’s problems.  The problem in the Lake Wingra Watershed is that storm water management is weighted heavily toward the grey infrastructure end of the scale.  Grey infrastructure is used–at the municipal level–to the near exclusion of green infrastructure.

Each of the six constructed storm water detention ponds in the UW-Arboretum uses traditional storm water management techniques–straight, rip-rap channels, concrete box culverts, and detention or settling ponds.  Only one–Pond #2 in the SE corner of the UW-Madison Arboretum–has bioswales as part of the design.   And we are not even counting Lake Wingra which is itself a large storm water detention pond.  Lake Wingra receives direct storm water flow from the Pickford Street outfall and from a storm drain in the Town of Madison in the Arboretum.

Typical storm water pond on Monroe Street in Madison.

A typical storm water pond.  This one is on Monroe Street in Madison.

There are a few rain gardens scattered about the watershed but most are on commercial or residential property and few, if any, are on public lands.  Recent figures from the LA 920 project show that there are 25 city planned or installed rain gardens in the Lake Wingra Watershed; and over 35 homeowner installed rain gardens.  True, each of these rain gardens helps and is an increment of improved rainfall infiltration, but they are not enough and are not part of a larger, watershed wide planning approach to conserving precious rainfall and other natural resources.

New Visionary Plans for the Lake Wingra Watershed

Just when we were about to give up  hope we discover that there are  two new unofficial planning documents from students in the UW-Madison Landscape Architecture Department that propose design plans for incorporating green infrastructure in the watershed.  These planning documents are richly illustrated with real-life examples of innovative design and management techniques used by cities and towns across the country to manage storm water in an enlightened way.  If you want to be inspired please read these two documents.

Timely Visions

First, from 2011 comes, “Lake Wingra Watershed, Design Strategies for a Healthy Watershed”, by the LA 920 Regional Design Workshop.   This comprehensive planning and design document focuses on opportunities for green infrastructure.  Click here for the document.  This plan examines the wider watershed opportunities for green infrastructure and uses real case studies from around the country of  municipalities that have successfully incorporated green infrastructure in their public works.

Next up is the capstone project from Jody Schimek in the Landscape Architecture Department.  Her work in this 2013 study examined the potential for , “Design for Healthy Neighborhoods and Lakes”, using Monroe Street and Wingra Park, as a case study.  Click here for the document. 

This study is timely as Monroe Street is scheduled for reconstruction in the next year or two.  If green infrastructure design principles are not used this time, it will be another generation or two before we have another opportunity to make sensible improvements to the way we manage our watershed.

Advertisements

About Steve Glass

The blogger is a restoration ecologist practicing and writing in the Midwestern United States.
This entry was posted in Bioretention facility, Green stormwater infrastructure, Groundwater, Lake Wingra Watershed, Lake Wingra Watershed management planning, Phosphorus in storm water, Rain gardens, Storm water, Stormwater best management practices and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Visionary Plans for Monroe Street and Lake Wingra Watershed

  1. Sandy Stark says:

    Talk about a timely post! The reconstruction of Monroe Street is now 2017. Not sure about Gregory Street. Commonwealth coming soon. All impacting Lake Wingra and the Arb. How can we get these plans considered seriously by key players? Sign me up!—Sandy Stark, DMNA neighborhood

    • Steve Glass says:

      Sandy,
      I think one way is for all of us to let FOLW know we support these ideas. Another is to urge our Alders to make sure these Green Infrastructure techniques get consideration and inclusion in future engineering designs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s